A comparison of changes in river runoff from multiple global and catchment-scale hydrological models under global warming scenarios of 1 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C
Creators
- Gosling, Simon N.1
- Zaherpour, Jamal1
- Mount, Nick J.1
- Hattermann, Fred F.2
-
Dankers, Rutger3
-
Arheimer, Berit4
-
Breuer, Lutz5
- Ding, Jie6
- Haddeland, Ingjerd7
-
Kumar, Rohini8
- Kundu, Dipangkar9
-
Liu, Junguo6, 10
-
van Griensven, Ann11, 12
-
Veldkamp, Ted13
-
Vetter, Tobias2
- Wang, Xiaoyan14
- Zhang, Xinxin10
- and 7 more
- 1. University of Nottingham
- 2. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
- 3. Met Office
- 4. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
- 5. University of Giessen
- 6. South University of Science and Technology of China
- 7. Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate
- 8. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
- 9. University of Sydney
- 10. Beijing Forestry University
- 11. Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- 12. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
- 13. VU University Amsterdam
- 14. Hohai University
Description
We present one of the first climate change impact assessments on river runoff that utilises an ensemble of global hydrological models (Glob-HMs) and an ensemble of catchment-scale hydrological models (Cat-HMs), across multiple catchments: the upper Amazon, Darling, Ganges, Lena, upper Mississippi, upper Niger, Rhine and Tagus. Relative changes in simulated mean annual runoff (MAR) and four indicators of high and low extreme flows are compared between the two ensembles. The ensemble median values of changes in runoff with three different scenarios of global-mean warming (1, 2 and 3 °C above pre-industrial levels) are generally similar between the two ensembles, although the ensemble spread is often larger for the Glob-HM ensemble. In addition the ensemble spread is normally larger than the difference between the two ensemble medians. Whilst we find compelling evidence for projected runoff changes for the Rhine (decrease), Tagus (decrease) and Lena (increase) with global warming, the sign and magnitude of change for the other catchments is unclear. Our model results highlight that for these three catchments in particular, global climate change mitigation, which limits global-mean temperature rise to below 2 °C above preindustrial levels, could avoid some of the hydrological hazards that could be seen with higher magnitudes of global warming.
Open Access
Licence Attribution (CC BY)
Publisher Website
Access full text
Publication Details
Journal article
Journal:
Climatic Change
Publisher:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
ISSN:
01650009
Volume:
141
Pages:
577-595
Persistent Identifiers
References
Abdulla FA, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Smith JA (1996) Application of a macroscale...
Read more
Arora VK, Boer GJ (2001) Effects of simulated climate change on the hydrology of...
Read more
Bergstrom S, Forsman A (1973) Development of a conceptual deterministic rainfall...
Read more
Arnell NW, Brown S, Gosling SN, Gottschalk P, Hinkel J, Huntingford C, Lloyd-Hug...
Read more
Warszawski L, Frieler K, Huber V, Piontek F, Serdeczny O, Schewe J (2014) The in...
Read more
Showing first 5 of 51 references.