Introducing the Green Protein Footprint method as an understandable measure of the environmental cost of anchovy consumption
Creators
- 1. University of Cantabria
- 2. Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
- 3. CIRAD, UPR Recyclage et risque, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
- 4. UNESCO Chair in Life Cycle and Climate Change, Escola Superior de Comerç International (ESCI-UPF), Pg. Pujades 1, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
- 5. Lavola Cosostenibilidad, Rbla. Catalunya 6, 08007, Spain.
Description
In a global framework of growing concern for food security and environmental protection, the selection of food products with higher protein content and lower environmental impact is a challenge. To assess the reliability of different strategies along the food supply chain, a measure of food cost through the environmental impact-protein content binomial is necessary. This study proposes a standardized method to calculate the Green Protein Footprint (GPF) index, a method that assesses both the environmental impact of a food product and its protein content provided to consumers. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to calculate the environmental impact of the selected food products, and a Life Cycle Protein Assessment (LCPA) was performed by accounting for the protein content along the supply chain. Although the GPF can be applied to all food chain products, this paper is focused on European anchovy-based products for indirect human consumption (fishmeal) and for direct human consumption (fresh, salted and canned anchovies). Moreover, the circular economy concept was applied considering the valorization of the anchovy residues generated during the canning process. These residues were used to produce fishmeal, which was employed in bass aquaculture. Hence, humans are finally consuming fish protein from the residues, closing the loop of the original product life cycle. More elaborated, multi-ingredient food products (salted and canned anchovy products), presented higher GPF values due to higher environmental impacts. Furthermore, the increase of food loss throughout their life cycle caused a decrease in the protein content. Regarding salted and canned products, the packaging was the main hotspot. The influence of the packaging was evaluated using the GPF, reaffirming that plastic was the best alternative. These results highlighted the importance of improving packaging materials in food products.
Open Access
Licence Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND)
Publisher Website
Access full text
Publication Details
Journal article
Persistent Identifiers
Funding
References
V\u00e1zquez-Rowe . The role of consumer purchase and post-purchase decision-mak...
Read more
Jerbi . Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two rearing techniques of seas bass (Dice...
Read more
004-983-885-161-325
Read more
Hospido . Environmental assessment of canned tuna manufacture with a life-cycle ...
Read more
Laso . When product diversification influences life cycle impact assessment: a c...
Read more
Showing first 5 of 50 references.
Scholarly Citations
MeSH Terms
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) is the NLM controlled vocabulary for indexing biomedical articles.
Click any term to view its definition and hierarchy.
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness