Published February 7, 2025
0 views Journal article Open Access Open Access

Factors affecting heat resilience of drone honey bees (Apis mellifera) and their sperm.

  • 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • 2. University of British Columbia
  • 3. Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • 4. North Carolina State University
  • 5. Center for Integrative Bee Research (CIBER), Department of Entomology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
  • 6. University of California, Riverside
  • 7. Department of Microbiology & Plant Pathology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
  • 8. Department of Molecular, Cell & Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
  • 9. Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • 10. University of Manitoba

Description

Extreme temperatures associated with climate change are expected to impact the physiology and fertility of a variety of insects, including honey bees. Most previous work on this topic has focused on female honey bees (workers and queens), and comparatively little research has investigated how heat exposure affects males (drones). To address this gap, we tested body mass, viral infections, and population origin as predictors of drone survival and sperm viability in a series of heat challenge assays. We found that individual body mass was highly influential, with heavier drones being more likely to survive a heat challenge (4 h at 42°C) than smaller drones. In a separate experiment, we compared the survival of Northern California and Southern California drones in response to the same heat challenge (4 h at 42°C), and found that Southern Californian drones - which are enriched for African ancestry - were more likely to survive a heat challenge than drones originating from Northern California. To avoid survivor bias, we conducted sperm heat challenges using in vitro assays and found remarkable variation in sperm heat resilience among drones sourced from different commercial beekeeping operations, with some exhibiting no reduction in sperm viability after heat challenge and others exhibiting a 75% reduction in sperm viability. Further investigating potential causal factors for such variation, we found no association between drone mass and viability of sperm in in vitro sperm heat challenge assays, but virus inoculation (with Israeli acute paralysis virus) exacerbated the negative effect of heat on sperm viability. These experiments establish a vital framework for understanding the importance of population origin and comorbidities for drone heat sensitivity.
Enabled by The Lens

Open Access

Licence Attribution (CC BY)
Publisher Website Access full text