Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in Green and Blue Infrastructure designs. A case study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) - Morocco.
Creators
-
Barbosa, Ana1
-
Martín, Beatriz1
-
Hermoso, Virgilio2
- Arevalo-Torres, Juan1
- Barbière, Julian1
-
Martínez-López, Javier3
-
Domisch, Sami2
- Langhans, Simone D.3
- Balbi, Stefano3
- Villa, Ferdinando3
- Delacámara, Gonzalo4
-
Teixeira, Heliana5
-
Nogueira, António J.A.5
-
Lillebø, Ana I.5
- Gil-Jiménez, Yolanda6
- McDonald, Hugh7
- Iglesias-Campos, Alejandro1
- and 7 more
- 1. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Marine Policy and Regional Coordination Section, 7 Place de Fontenoy, F-75352 Paris 07 SP, France.
- 2. Leibniz Association
- 3. University of the Basque Country
- 4. University of Alcalá
- 5. University of Aveiro
- 6. Junta of Andalusia
- 7. Ecologic Brands, Inc.
Description
Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI) is a network designed and planned to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services and to protect biodiversity. Existing GBI designs lacked a systematic method to allocate restoration zones. This study proposes a novel approach for systematically selecting cost-effective areas for restoration on the basis of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and ecosystem condition to give an optimal spatial design of GBI. The approach was tested at a regional scale, in a transboundary setting encompassing the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean in Andalusia (Spain) - Morocco (IBRM), across three aquatic ecosystems: freshwater, coastal and marine. We applied Marxan with Zones to stakeholder-defined scenarios of GBI in the IBRM. Specifically, we aimed to identify management zones within the GBl that addressed different conservation, restoration and exploitation objectives. Although almost all conservation targets were achieved, our results highlighted that the proportion of conservation features (i.e., biodiversity, ecosystem services) that would be compromised in the GBl, and the proportion of provisioning services that would be lost due to conservation (i.e., incidental representation) are potentially large, indicating that the probability of conflicts between conservation and exploitation goals in the area is high. The implementation of restoration zones improved connectivity across the GBI, and also achieved European and global policy targets. Our approach may help guide future applications of GBI to implement the flexible conservation management that aquatic environments require, considering many areas at different spatial scales, across multiple ecosystems, and in transboundary contexts.
Open Access
Licence Attribution (CC BY)
Publisher Website
Access full text
Publication Details
Journal article
Persistent Identifiers
Funding
Financial Support
European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration — Grant: 642317
Read more
References
Lehtom\u00e4ki . Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization us...
Read more
Villa . A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment, PL...
Read more
Chan . Conservation planning for ecosystem services, PLoS Biol.. 2006; 4
Read more
Lagabrielle . Multi-scale multi-level marine spatial planning: a novel methodolo...
Read more
Hermoso . Integrating multidirectional connectivity requirements in systematic c...
Read more
Showing first 5 of 54 references.