Differential Karst Control of Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi, Sichuan Basin, SW China
Creators
- 1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
- 2. China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
- 3. Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR&GZAR/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
- 4. Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China
Description
The dolomite of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area of central Sichuan Basin is rich in hydrocarbon resources. It has experienced superimposition-reformation of multistage karstification, and is the key target for studying deep ancient carbonate reservoirs. Exploration and development practices show that there are great differences in the development of karst reservoirs of the fourth member of Dengying Formation between the platform margin and intraplatform in Gaoshiti-Moxi area. However, the differences in the genetic mechanism of karst reservoirs between these two zones are unclear. Therefore, based on an integrated analysis of core, thin section, drilling, logging, and geochemical test data, this study clarifies the differences in karstification between the platform margin and intraplatform and conducts a comparative analysis of the controlling factors for the differences in karst reservoirs. Results show that the fourth member of Dengying Formation experienced superimposition-reformation of four types of paleokarstification, including eogenetic meteoric water karst, supergene karst, coastal mixed water karst, and burial karst. Large-scale dissolved fractures and caves are mainly controlled by meteoric water karstification, primarily developing three types of reservoir space: vug type, fracture-vug type, and cave type. Dolomite and quartz fillings are mainly formed in the medium-deep burial period. Four types of paleokarstification are developed in the platform margin, while the coastal mixed water karst is not developed in the intraplatform. Eogenetic meteoric water karst and supergene karst in the platform margin are stronger than those in the intraplatform, while burial karst shows no notable difference between the two zones. The thickness of soluble rock (mound-shoal complex), karst paleogeomorphology, and different types of paleokarstification are the main controlling factors for the difference in karst reservoirs between the platform margin and the intraplatform.
Publication Details
Journal article
Persistent Identifiers
DOI
10.3390/min15121314
Read more
Funding
Financial Support
Basic Research expenses of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences — Grant: JKYZD202331
Read more
Basic Research expenses of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences — Grant: JKYQN202368
Read more
Basic Research expenses of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences — Grant: JKYQN202372
Read more
Basic Research Fund of Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences — Grant: YRQN2025020
Read more
Basic Research Fund of Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences — Grant: 2022011
Read more
References
Feng . Hydrothermal dolomite reservoir in the Precambrian Dengying Formation of ...
Read more
Yan . Characteristics and development model of karst reservoirs in the fourth me...
Read more
Lonnee . Pervasive dolomitization with subsequent hydrothermal alteration in the...
Read more
He . Thermal evolution of the Upper Yangtze Craton: Secular cooling and short-li...
Read more
Chen . Pore-fillings of dolomite reservoirs in Sinian Dengying Formationin Sichu...
Read more
Showing first 5 of 45 references.