Establishing the foundation for the global observing system for marine life
Creators
- Satterthwaite, Erin V.1, 2, 3
-
Bax, Nicholas J.4, 5
- Miloslavich, Patricia6, 7
-
Ratnarajah, Lavenia4, 8
- Canonico, Gabrielle9
-
Dunn, Daniel C.10
- Simmons, Samantha E.11
-
Carini, Roxanne J.12, 13, 14
- Evans, Karen4
-
Allain, Valerie15
- Appeltans, Ward16
- Batten, Sonia D.17
-
Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro18
- Bernard, Anthony T. F.19, 20
- Bristol, S.21
-
Benson, Abigail21
- Buttigieg, Pier Luigi22
- Gerhardinger, Leopoldo Cavaleri23
- Chiba, Sanae24
-
Davies, Tammy E.25
-
Duffy, J. Emmett26
- Giron-Nava, Alfredo27
- Hsu, Astrid J.1
- Kraberg, Alexandra28
- Kudela, Raphael M.3
- Lear, D29
-
Montes, Enrique30
-
Muller-Karger, Frank E.30
- O'Brien, Todd D.31
- Obura, David32
- Provoost, Pieter16
- Pruckner, Sara33
- Rebelo, Lisa-Maria34
- Selig, Elizabeth R.27
- Kjesbu, Olav Sigurd35
- Starger, Craig J.2
-
Stuart-Smith, Rick D.5
-
Vierros, Marjo36
- Waller, John37
-
Weatherdon, Lauren V.33
- Wellman, Tristan P.21
- Zivian, Anna38
- and 32 more
- 1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography
- 2. Colorado State University
- 3. University of California, Berkeley
- 4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- 5. University of Tasmania
- 6. Simón Bolívar University
- 7. University of Delaware
- 8. University of Liverpool
- 9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- 10. University of Queensland
- 11. U.S. Marine Mammal Commission, United States
- 12. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
- 13. Johns Hopkins University
- 14. University of Washington
- 15. Pacific Community, Fisheries, Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems, New Caledonia
- 16. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Ocean Biodiversity Information System, Belgium
- 17. North Pacific Marine Science Organization
- 18. University of Pisa
- 19. Rhodes University
- 20. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
- 21. United States Geological Survey
- 22. GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research/Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration, Germany
- 23. Brazilian Future Ocean Panel, Brazil
- 24. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
- 25. BirdLife International
- 26. Smithsonian Institution
- 27. Stanford University
- 28. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
- 29. Marine Biological Association, United Kingdom
- 30. University of South Florida
- 31. United States Department of Energy Office of Science
- 32. CORDIO East Africa, Kenya
- 33. World Conservation Monitoring Centre
- 34. International Water Management Institute
- 35. Institute of Marine Research, Norway
- 36. Coastal Policy and Humanities Research, Canada
- 37. Global Biodiversity Information Facility
- 38. Ocean Conservancy
Description
Maintaining healthy, productive ecosystems in the face of pervasive and accelerating human impacts including climate change requires globally coordinated and sustained observations of marine biodiversity. Global coordination is predicated on an understanding of the scope and capacity of existing monitoring programs, and the extent to which they use standardized, interoperable practices for data management. Global coordination also requires identification of gaps in spatial and ecosystem coverage, and how these gaps correspond to management priorities and information needs. We undertook such an assessment by conducting an audit and gap analysis from global databases and structured surveys of experts. Of 371 survey respondents, 203 active, long-term (>5 years) observing programs systematically sampled marine life. These programs spanned about 7% of the ocean surface area, mostly concentrated in coastal regions of the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. Seagrasses, mangroves, hard corals, and macroalgae were sampled in 6% of the entire global coastal zone. Two-thirds of all observing programs offered accessible data, but methods and conditions for access were highly variable. Our assessment indicates that the global observing system is largely uncoordinated which results in a failure to deliver critical information required for informed decision-making such as, status and trends, for the conservation and sustainability of marine ecosystems and provision of ecosystem services. Based on our study, we suggest four key steps that can increase the sustainability, connectivity and spatial coverage of biological Essential Ocean Variables in the global ocean: (1) sustaining existing observing programs and encouraging coordination among these; (2) continuing to strive for data strategies that follow FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable); (3) utilizing existing ocean observing platforms and enhancing support to expand observing along coasts of developing countries, in deep ocean basins, and near the poles; and (4) targeting capacity building efforts. Following these suggestions could help create a coordinated marine biodiversity observing system enabling ecological forecasting and better planning for a sustainable use of ocean resources.
Open Access
Licence Attribution (CC BY)
Publisher Website
Access full text
Publication Details
Journal article
Journal:
Frontiers in Marine Science
Publisher:
Frontiers Media SA
ISSN:
22967745
Volume:
8
Pages:
1-19
Persistent Identifiers
DOI
10.3389/fmars.2021.737416
Read more
MAGID
3211253920
References
Hays . New tools to identify the location of seagrass meadows: marine grazers as...
Read more
McCauley . Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean., Science. 2015; ...
Read more
Edgar . Establishing the ecological basis for conservation of shallow marine lif...
Read more
Bax . Linking capacity development to goos monitoring networks to achieve sustai...
Read more
Danovaro . Ecological variables for developing a global deep-ocean monitoring an...
Read more
Showing first 5 of 100 references.